• Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
Code of Practice


The ACDM is a trade association formed between commercially competitive manufacturers of composite doors, who have a common interest in ensuring that the product concept is maintained at the highest level and is not denigrated by poor performance alternatives, or by manufacturing companies who do not maintain the highest standards of operational professionalism and thereby risk bringing the industry into disrepute.

Voluntary Code:

It is an unconditional requirement that all members sign up to this voluntary Code of Practice and agree to uphold them at all times.

This is intended to establish agreed standards within the industry. These will be upheld by ACDM members, and thus should thereby give confidence and peace of mind to future buyers or specifiers, many of whom many be understandably mystified by the subtle differences between so many construction methods and materials.

In addition to the existence of these standards it is equally important that they are enforced, and seen to be enforced, in order to gain further reassurances with clients and customers.

This, therefore, demonstrates, that there are some worthwhile advantages to be had from purchasing from an ACDM member.


Product Differences:

Manufacturers have developed their products independently from each other hence there is a wide variety of specifications and construction methods available. However, the important and, arguably, sole criteria is the accredited performance and longevity of each, irrespective of their construction. Therefore the ACDM makes no attempt to compare different specification but instead focuses on the proven performance criteria, independently assessed by UKAS accredited test houses. In fact, only by having achieved this rigorous accreditation can door companies become members of the ACDM.


Rights of the Specifier/Client/Customer:

Any customer purchasing from any ACDM member door supplier can make an application for the Association for a “Specific Review” of their complaint, if they feel that a particular member company is not upholding the CPM standards in some way. It is in the interests of all ACDM members that they adjudicate such matters fairly and without favour, since otherwise the Association would itself fall into disrepute.


The Code of Practice for ACDM members

This code requires all member companies to be consistent to The Code of Practice principles in their dealings with all clients, specifiers, customers, suppliers and all other associated industry organisations.


Code of Practice Principles:


  • Honesty – to ensure that the highest standards of honesty are maintained at all times in all commercial dealings.

  • Accreditation – to ensure that no false or misleading claims are made regarding the achievement of industry standard performance criteria.

  • Legality – to conform to English, EU and other legal requirements.

  • Professionalism – to deal with every commercial encounter in a polite, responsible and expeditious manner.

  • Equality and Diversity – to respect the human rights of all, at anytime, in any commercial endeavour.

  • Integrity – to ensure that there is no corruption or collusion with employees of any company/organisation involved with any business contract.

  • Fair Dealing – to treat customers and suppliers fairly, including protecting commercial confidentiality where required.

  • Specific Review – members agree to be bound by the ACDM procedure for Specific Review.


Specific Review

In the event of any customer of any ACDM member company, who feels that the company has not upheld the Code and wishes to make a complaint, then they should do so, in writing, directly to the company involved, in the first instance – and follow that company’s complaints procedure.

Should this not be dealt with satisfactorily by the company, causing the customer to wish to appeal against the decision they have received, then they should apply formally, in writing to the Company Secretary of the ACDM, requesting a Specific Review of the matter. (Complaints to be limited to the Code of Practice)


The following confidential procedure would then take place:

  • The member company concerned would be informed of the complaint by the ACDM Company Secretary and must agree not to directly confront the complainant but to deal with the matter strictly through the Association.

  • The member company would be asked to comment on the issue and to advise the Company Secretary of any extenuating circumstances.

  • The complainant would be advised that the matter was to be investigated and be asked to provide full details to the Company Secretary with as much supporting documentation as possible.

  • These details would be forwarded to the members company’s ACDM representative (who must also be a Director) for their official reply.

  • Unless the member company admitted liability (and agreed to recompense to the complainant directly) then the details would be circulated to a pre-determined Specific Review Team (SRT) to be made up of a least four full members, chaired by a nominated person from those present at the meeting. The SRT would meet at a specially convened meeting, to assess the case from both perspectives and propose a resolution which must be supported by a minimum 75% of the SRT.

  • All member companies accept that given that scenario, they agree to abide by the resolution proposed by the SRT, or their membership could be terminated.

Revised March 2012



Member Login